Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

981 Boxster GTS

Discussion of other cars non-Z4
Angelus666
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2257
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

981 Boxster GTS

Post by Angelus666 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 10:21 pm

greg81 wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2020 10:04 pm
Angelus666 wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:12 pm It's only 330 bhp, but I've come to realise that as all the manufacturers chase ever-increasing power numbers (which is easy to get caught up in), the fun can only be had when you get a car to 8-tenths of it's limit...
My boss is always bragging that his tuned 435D has 401bhp which is 100 more than me but he doesn't quite grasp that his car is almost 600kg heavier than mine, which gives me more per ton.

Silly people getting hung up on numbers!
The R8 with 610 bhp and 4wd is bonkers fast, but rewards with the v10 engine note. The 570s feels even quicker to me because of the driving position but because the handling is so ridiculously good you find yourself being a bit of a tool on the public road, on a dry road you can take roundabouts at 70mph without too much fuss.

User avatar
Wyldie85
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2426
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:25 pm
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Contact:

981 Boxster GTS

Post by Wyldie85 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 10:25 pm

That’s lovely. More pictures welcome. I like this dealers too. They seem to stock nice or unusual examples of things. They have a lovely blue Macan there at the moment as well.
2006 Silver grey 2.5si Convertible - Sold
2006 ///M Convertible - Sold
2019 Mercedes C300 AMG Line Premium Plus Estate
2019 San Francisco red M40i inc Tech & Comfort packs

Image

Online
User avatar
MrPT
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4747
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:44 pm
Location: Bucks/Oxon

981 Boxster GTS

Post by MrPT » Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:57 am

Fantastic choice. They are an utter joy to drive and sound incredible. Can totally understand the logic vs the 570s and the R8. Spend the difference on lots of road trips. :thumbsup:
2008 Z4MC: heavy wheels | crap suspension | skittish rear end | wobbly engine | not enough induction noise | underwhelming turn in | inconsistent braking | lardy battery | chubby steering wheel
2006 Z4 2.5si: gone

User avatar
pvr
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26269
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: South East UK

981 Boxster GTS

Post by pvr » Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:48 am

That looks great indeed. But what gearbox does it have ...
Current:
911-50 Black - unique spec
X5M - 575 hp of fun in a V8
Abarth 595 Comp.
Golf Clipper - collectors item
Z4 3.0si Black Sapphire
VW ID.3

Previous:
Z4M Silver Grey - non flimper spec (gone to Bing)
Z4 3.0 Toledo

Babw
Member
Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 5:08 pm

981 Boxster GTS

Post by Babw » Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:50 am

Great choice and I see what you mean relative to the 570s etc but your car is incredibly capable to the point within legal limits it's barely breaking a sweat.

The dampening and road manners are so good on modern Porsches that I find myself putting PASM into sport mode and generally being a bit ham fisted with steering inputs in my Cayman to get that heightened feeling of being involved. I think the Cayman is the best all around sports car on the market today but find myself looking at S1 Elises for that *insert cliché* involvement at legal speeds.

Modern cars are just too good and why I find myself drawn towards Frankenstein cars like K20 Elise etc where there's just a raw edge to them which OEM seems to dial out.

Angelus666
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2257
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

981 Boxster GTS

Post by Angelus666 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:16 am

It's a PDK, which I had to go for as the missus just won't drive a manual.....actually I think she won't ever touch a paddle and just leave it in auto every time. She used to drive the CSL only in full auto, even when it would bunny hop down the road in the morning during it's 15 minute warm up. :roll: The GTS definitely excels in lots of ways, and I think they're quite a rare sight on the UK road, which is important to me and part of the reason why I have stuck with the MC for 5 years.

User avatar
LeeZ4MR
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 4206
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 2:36 pm
Location: Lincs

981 Boxster GTS

Post by LeeZ4MR » Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:21 am

That does look very nice! 8) :thumbsup:

I'm more of a manual fan, but I've never heard a bad word about the PDK.

Enjoy collecting it. :D
Current...BMW F82 M4 Coupe 2018
370Z Roadster 2011
Merc GLE400d 2022
Caterham 7 2002

Previous...
640d 2012
330i 2006
Z4MR 2006
E92 M3 2009
X5 4.8iS 2004
TVR Cerbera 4.5

john-e89
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 11079
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:27 pm

981 Boxster GTS

Post by john-e89 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:23 pm

Firstly it’s not nice slating a car when there’s a member that has just bought one but I’ve spoken to Greg81 via PM in the past about 718’s so he knows my thoughts, plus he’s by no means precious about it and I’ve no doubt sticks two fingers up to what I say which is exactly how it should be..... :lol:

Reading your remarks about the 570 and Audi rung a bell with me and the 718 GTS, hugely capable at getting up to high speed but the theatre just wasn’t there for me. You obvs know how the M’s are and especially with a GruppeM or similar fitted the cars a riot on every trip out should you want it, so much character it’s hilariously theatrical. You can’t have that with the turbo boxer engine, 60, 70, 80 etc, came up incredibly quickly but you simply didn’t know it, a mere small rise in engine note doesn’t cut it. Having such an incredible chassis just made the whole experience worse not better, so frustrating that the car had everything it needed to be brilliant yet lacking in one of the two most important aspects, chassis and engine note. I knew deep down early on that we weren’t going to gell so I got out, thankfully before the 4.0 was announced. You win some you lose some. The 718 is a superb car with better tech than a 981 and it’s great that Greg for example is happy with his, but going on what you say about your wants from a car you’ve made absolutely the right choice, something I should have done at the time. :thumbsup:
M roady...OEM CSL’s, strut brace, Remus back boxes, ZHP
MR2 MK 2
E89 35i project car...mapped 365bhp, M4 stoppers & wheels, KWV3’s, H&R front ARB, M3 front arms, strut brace Eisenmann cat back race exhaust, VRSF downpipes inbound
E89 35is
G29

Angelus666
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2257
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

981 Boxster GTS

Post by Angelus666 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:36 pm

Absolutely spot on, which is why the Z4M is such an interesting proposition. It's as equally sh*t as it is good, so you drive around the crap ride, suspension, brakes, interior quality....as it gives you rewards back in theatre and drama. My lady wife says my MC sounds like it going to explode when it gets to 8k rpm.....I think that's a good thing :rofl:

User avatar
Jembo
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 6030
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:59 pm
Location: 1066 Country

981 Boxster GTS

Post by Jembo » Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:06 pm

My mate decided to go 718 simply because of a longer warranty, though I also think it’s because he’s not a noise hooligan that also played a large part in his decision
Attachments
0E46DDCC-43C3-4720-B8E0-914C79B5E5BE.jpeg
0E46DDCC-43C3-4720-B8E0-914C79B5E5BE.jpeg (435.48 KiB) Viewed 1112 times
Joined the dark side with a ///M Hell Bronze Sepang Coupe :happyclap:
Ex Aug 2005 Maldives Blue 3 litre cruizer, lots of toyz,

Lifer 54

User avatar
buzyg
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26544
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 6:11 pm
Location: Cornwall

981 Boxster GTS

Post by buzyg » Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:32 pm

Angelus666 wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:36 pm Absolutely spot on, which is why the Z4M is such an interesting proposition. It's as equally sh*t as it is good, so you drive around the crap ride, suspension, brakes, interior quality....as it gives you rewards back in theatre and drama. My lady wife says my MC sounds like it going to explode when it gets to 8k rpm.....I think that's a good thing :rofl:
You should sit her in an MR at 8k rpm :lol: :thumbsup:
Image

User avatar
tomscott
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 7478
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:26 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

981 Boxster GTS

Post by tomscott » Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:05 pm

Lovely. Congrats!

If I could justify the cost this would be in my top 2 of choices.

sharif
Member
Member
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 05, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: North London

981 Boxster GTS

Post by sharif » Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:59 pm

Congratulations, that looks great!
Current - Edition 30 Golf GTi

Previous - Z4MC

greg81

981 Boxster GTS

Post by greg81 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:31 pm

john-e89 wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:23 pm Firstly it’s not nice slating a car when there’s a member that has just bought one but I’ve spoken to Greg81 via PM in the past about 718’s so he knows my thoughts, plus he’s by no means precious about it and I’ve no doubt sticks two fingers up to what I say which is exactly how it should be.....
:thumbsup:

Correct on all fronts. Everyone wants different things out of a car so there's no right or wrong. My decisions were based on various opinions and my own experiences as you say so none taken. For me it's about a newer car, long warranty etc etc. I personally don't find the noise of the 718 dull at all as it certainly growls in sport mode and can be driven quietly if desired, but engine note was by no means a deal-breaker for me

OP got the car he wanted, and I mine so it's win-win for all involved :D

Angelus666
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2257
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

981 Boxster GTS

Post by Angelus666 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:01 pm

Absolutely Greg, if everyone wanted the same it would be a boring old world...but yours is a much more interesting colour than my boring old white (I had a choice between white or silver). Also, you’re definitely not alone loving the 718, a lot of my car liking mates much prefer the 718, it’s a lot quicker in the real world and has sharper lines across the styling (I actually prefer every design angle on the 718 v the 981, but the front bumper being so straight lined and flat is a real let down).

Post Reply