Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
-
- Member
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:21 pm
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
I love my z4 3.0i. I've had a few e46 m3s which got boring for me so I swapped em for the z and couldn't b arsed when the s54 headache.
Now starting to feel like I want a z4m. Just wondering if it's worth the extra money and headache?
I have a roadster btw and will only buy a roadster.
Now starting to feel like I want a z4m. Just wondering if it's worth the extra money and headache?
I have a roadster btw and will only buy a roadster.
- MACK
- Lifer
- Posts: 3600
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:38 am
- Location: Manchester
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
Alot will depend on how you drive, pottering around under 4k, then its not worth it. Screaming to the rev limiter and doing track days etc then yes.
Silver 05 3.0i SE
Mods inc - F/L Xenons Clear Ind Rear Lights M Sport Seats & Wheel Eibach/B4 3.64 DIFF (SOLD)
White E89 20i M Sport
Mods inc- B12 kit, M3 Arms, 18" Zito 935's with PS4's, Decat & Remap, Switchable Exhaust Flap (SOLD)
Mods inc - F/L Xenons Clear Ind Rear Lights M Sport Seats & Wheel Eibach/B4 3.64 DIFF (SOLD)
White E89 20i M Sport
Mods inc- B12 kit, M3 Arms, 18" Zito 935's with PS4's, Decat & Remap, Switchable Exhaust Flap (SOLD)
- ba3bas
- Member
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:47 am
- Location: Barnet
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
How about the middle ground? Supercharged 3.0si I have for sale
-
- Member
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 8:40 pm
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
My view when I was looking at Z's was the 3.0i and especially the 3.0Si is something like 90% of the car for 50-70% of the cost up front and 50% ongoing running costs (figures guesstimated for example)
For me, this time, the M was worth it. I wanted the engine, seats, 4 exhausts, hydraulic steering, bumpers etc. Individually those things aren't particularly grand (bar the engine) but all together they made the 10% worth he money.
No doubt the running costs are much higher for servicing an M.
I also think the M should depreciate fairly slowly so am hopeful to get a decent chunk of capital back when I sell. Not sure how the 3.0 cars will hold out.
Conversely you don't sound like you enjoyed the S54 or your M3 so maybe a waste of money upgrading to get the bug bears again? The Z4M is less resolved than an E46 M3.
For me, this time, the M was worth it. I wanted the engine, seats, 4 exhausts, hydraulic steering, bumpers etc. Individually those things aren't particularly grand (bar the engine) but all together they made the 10% worth he money.
No doubt the running costs are much higher for servicing an M.
I also think the M should depreciate fairly slowly so am hopeful to get a decent chunk of capital back when I sell. Not sure how the 3.0 cars will hold out.
Conversely you don't sound like you enjoyed the S54 or your M3 so maybe a waste of money upgrading to get the bug bears again? The Z4M is less resolved than an E46 M3.
- Yorkie Z
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Plymouth
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
I've been down the same road as you. Had an M3, sold it. Bought a 3.0 Z4, had that for two completely trouble free years including track days. Now have a Z4M and absolutely love it. Have to admit at the back of my mind i worry about problems with the S54 engine
Basically if you can afford all the stupid crap that goes with the M, £500 road tax for starters. Then I'd say go for it, just keep your fingers crossed it doesn't go pop.
Enjoy
I think the best all round option is the 3.0si and fit a an LSD. Fitted a LSD to my 3.0 within a month of owning it. Completely transformed the car for the better.
Basically if you can afford all the stupid crap that goes with the M, £500 road tax for starters. Then I'd say go for it, just keep your fingers crossed it doesn't go pop.
Enjoy
I think the best all round option is the 3.0si and fit a an LSD. Fitted a LSD to my 3.0 within a month of owning it. Completely transformed the car for the better.
Last edited by Yorkie Z on Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A Dirty M///
- MACK
- Lifer
- Posts: 3600
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:38 am
- Location: Manchester
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
He might have been tempted if it didn't have the wrong roof!ba3bas wrote:How about the middle ground? Supercharged 3.0si I have for sale
Silver 05 3.0i SE
Mods inc - F/L Xenons Clear Ind Rear Lights M Sport Seats & Wheel Eibach/B4 3.64 DIFF (SOLD)
White E89 20i M Sport
Mods inc- B12 kit, M3 Arms, 18" Zito 935's with PS4's, Decat & Remap, Switchable Exhaust Flap (SOLD)
Mods inc - F/L Xenons Clear Ind Rear Lights M Sport Seats & Wheel Eibach/B4 3.64 DIFF (SOLD)
White E89 20i M Sport
Mods inc- B12 kit, M3 Arms, 18" Zito 935's with PS4's, Decat & Remap, Switchable Exhaust Flap (SOLD)
- AlfaScozzesi
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 5:36 pm
- Location: Spean Bridge, Highlands
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
You should read paulgs1000 thread about this as he has just done the deed and still has both cars I think. The thread is open and gives both sides of the argument.
For me the M was the only way
For me the M was the only way
- srhutch
- Moderator
- Posts: 26959
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:22 pm
- Location: East Sussex, UK
- Contact:
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
Risks of the S54 are pot luck going by some on here. Mine's a weekend car doing 2-4k pa. I can leave it in the garage if something goes wrong and fix when I have the cash.
I SORN over winter which makes the VED much more acceptable to me. Insurance was cheaper by 20% than my 2.5si.
Depreciation is virtually non existent. I am sure privately I could get what I paid for mine give or take a few hundred quid, whereas my 2.5si would have dropped 4-5k.
At the end of the day only you can decide. I don't worry too much about the engine these days, but if I heard something that dind't sound right I would be getting it checked out straight away to minimise risk/damage and bills.
I SORN over winter which makes the VED much more acceptable to me. Insurance was cheaper by 20% than my 2.5si.
Depreciation is virtually non existent. I am sure privately I could get what I paid for mine give or take a few hundred quid, whereas my 2.5si would have dropped 4-5k.
At the end of the day only you can decide. I don't worry too much about the engine these days, but if I heard something that dind't sound right I would be getting it checked out straight away to minimise risk/damage and bills.
-
- Member
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 8:40 pm
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
Out of interest what S54 issues are people thinking about here?
My understanding was certai risks were present (cams, head gasket, etc) but chances were very slim. Want to make sure I'm not missing anything!!
My understanding was certai risks were present (cams, head gasket, etc) but chances were very slim. Want to make sure I'm not missing anything!!
- ba3bas
- Member
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:47 am
- Location: Barnet
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
Same issues you would get with any engine.
I've known of some bullit proof s54 and some that have had heads redone, and other issues all with a mix of low and high miles.
In fact the s54 doesn't like being sat around so don't be afraid by high miles either
I wouldn't be so concerned mate.
I've known of some bullit proof s54 and some that have had heads redone, and other issues all with a mix of low and high miles.
In fact the s54 doesn't like being sat around so don't be afraid by high miles either
I wouldn't be so concerned mate.
- Smartbear
- Lifer
- Posts: 13685
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:54 pm
- Location: a barn in Somerset
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
There seems to be a fair few M owners who have been unfortunate to have bearing shell problems with the S54 engine, that's pretty major-threads on here about itba3bas wrote:Same issues you would get with any engine.
I've known of some bullit proof s54 and some that have had heads redone, and other issues all with a mix of low and high miles.
In fact the s54 doesn't like being sat around so don't be afraid by high miles either
I wouldn't be so concerned mate.
Rob
e89 Sdrive 20i, plenty of mumbo & good economy-the thinking bears z4
e89 Sdrive 30i, this ones busted, pass me another...
e85 3.0si sold
- David-H
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 3:43 pm
- Location: Prees, Shropshire
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
I have a 3-0i roadster but it has been modified a little to give about 280 BHP, has a Drexler LSD, 330 brakes, MFSW etc and I did have a ///MC until recently. The M was faster and more "raw" but I did still enjoyed my 3.0i. I have since got rid of the ///MC and bought a new E89 sDrive 35i and I must say that I am very happy with having made that decision but will definitely be keeping the E85! The modified E85 is great fun to drive and with the LSD (ratio 4.08:1) has very fast acceleration and is definitely better handling than the 35i, but the E89 is a much better GT, is also quite fast but has all the modern refinements with regard to media, navigation, double clutch transmission, paddle sifting (that I love!), adaptive lighting etc, etc. I guess you have to prioritise your desirers / requirements and choose accordingly!
[I'll be keeping both of mine as they both offer a lot, albeit in different circumstances.]
[I'll be keeping both of mine as they both offer a lot, albeit in different circumstances.]
BMW Z4 3.0i auto ¦ Titanium Silver
107's : Drexler LSD
BMW M6 Gran Coupe ¦ Black Sapphire Metallic
DCT box with competition pack
Audi R8 4.2 Quattro¦ Grey metallic
6-speed manual
107's : Drexler LSD
BMW M6 Gran Coupe ¦ Black Sapphire Metallic
DCT box with competition pack
Audi R8 4.2 Quattro¦ Grey metallic
6-speed manual
-
- Member
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 7:42 pm
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
I was under the impression it was predominantly early S54s?Smartbear wrote:
There seems to be a fair few M owners who have been unfortunate to have bearing shell problems with the S54 engine, that's pretty major-threads on here about it
Rob
- 85genius
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:20 pm
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
Just my opinion but I was very tempted by an //M but having a few mates with M3s know what they spend on servicing was put off, really considered an Alpina but after driving an Si it was easily fast enough (too fast for most road driving really) so in the end couldn't justify the price difference to one of the more powerful Zeds. It also helped sway my decision that I could buy a nice si for cash whereas I'd have needed a loan/finance added if I went //M or Alpina.... Just wasn't worth the extra outlay to me in the end
Audi quattro driver
NOW SOLD - Ruby Black 3.0 SI Roadster
Previous - E85 2.5 Ti Silver - See avatar photo - R.I.P Destroyed by a Tranny
NOW SOLD - Ruby Black 3.0 SI Roadster
Previous - E85 2.5 Ti Silver - See avatar photo - R.I.P Destroyed by a Tranny
- Smartbear
- Lifer
- Posts: 13685
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:54 pm
- Location: a barn in Somerset
Z4 3.0i vs z4m...
Wow, how did you get another 50bhp from your 3litre!DLH wrote:I have a 3-0i roadster but it has been modified a little to give about 280 BHP, has a Drexler LSD, 330 brakes, MFSW etc and I did have a ///MC until recently. The M was faster and more "raw" but I did still enjoyed my 3.0i. I have since got rid of the ///MC and bought a new E89 sDrive 35i and I must say that I am very happy with having made that decision but will definitely be keeping the E85! The modified E85 is great fun to drive and with the LSD (ratio 4.08:1) has very fast acceleration and is definitely better handling than the 35i, but the E89 is a much better GT, is also quite fast but has all the modern refinements with regard to media, navigation, double clutch transmission, paddle sifting (that I love!), adaptive lighting etc, etc. I guess you have to prioritise your desirers / requirements and choose accordingly!
[I'll be keeping both of mine as they both offer a lot, albeit in different circumstances.]
Rob
e89 Sdrive 20i, plenty of mumbo & good economy-the thinking bears z4
e89 Sdrive 30i, this ones busted, pass me another...
e85 3.0si sold