Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Specific discussion about the E89 2009 Z4 (sDrive35is, sDrive35i, sDrive30i, sDrive23i)
Post Reply
mudmonkey
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2024 3:34 pm

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by mudmonkey » Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:04 pm

I'm in the market for a new car and am considering a 28i. I'm looking for something with a decent amount of power that isn't too terrible on fuel economy either, and it seems to fit the bill.

I know the whole 'mpg question' is highly subjective based on driving styles etc, but having poked around these forums a fair bit, the general consensus seems to be that the 28i only returns around 30mpg on average, a fair bit less than quoted (to be expected).

It seems the majority of 28i's around have the auto box, so my question is, does anyone here have a manual, and if so is there a marked improvement in mpg?

I usually check 'real mpg' figures on Honest John before I make a purchase just so I know what I'm getting myself into, and the auto is quoted as 29.4 mpg average whereas the manual is 37.1 mpg average.

Is anyone able to shed any light on this?

matsmith749
Member
Member
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:36 am

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by matsmith749 » Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:18 pm

On the older ones with a 6 speed box I'm not 100% sure - but the newer cars with the 8 speed box are more economical (any engine) versus the same engine with a manual.

In the good old days with 3 speed auto gearboxes it was the other way round.

I doubt the dirrefernce is huge, if you are getting 30 mpg with the auto I'd be expecting high twenties with the manual.
From Jan 2023 2016 e89 Z4 35is / mineral white / coral red interior / all the extras
SOLD 2010 e89 Z4 35is / space grey / coral red interior / all the extras
SOLD 2007 e85 Z4 3.0 si sport / midnight blue / champagne interior

Online
Pondrew
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 8523
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:20 pm
Location: Spaldingski

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by Pondrew » Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:32 pm

You should get at least 35mpg average on any manual N20 engine. Easily. Depending on journeys and the way you drive.
BTW the smart money would buy a cheaper 18i, or 20i and a £300 remap, as the engines are all identical.

Weirdly our previous N20 car, a remapped 18i running 270bhp, did an average of 39mpg over 6k miles, whilst the standard 20i we have now does around 36mpg. Same journeys. Both manual.
All good things come to those who wait. I'm really impatient which explains a lot.

F31 320i. Good car.
E89 20i Now fully dried
Z3 'free litre'. Project and a half. Complicated!
Mazda3 sold
Tatty old R56 Mini Cooper. Money pit!

mudmonkey
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2024 3:34 pm

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by mudmonkey » Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:38 pm

Yeah I was considering the remap route, as you say it would be significantly cheaper. There seemed to be a bit of disagreement as to whether the engines are completely identical, some people with 20i's had engine failures after a remap to 270bhp+ iirc, which put me off a bit.

Haha, that's pretty weird. How long/how many miles did you put on the 18i after the remap?

Online
Pondrew
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 8523
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:20 pm
Location: Spaldingski

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by Pondrew » Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:54 pm

mudmonkey wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:38 pm Haha, that's pretty weird. How long/how many miles did you put on the 18i after the remap?
6k. Had it done at 25k miles when I bought it. It is now owned by another regular forum member.
mudmonkey wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:38 pm There seemed to be a bit of disagreement as to whether the engines are completely identical, some people with 20i's had engine failures after a remap to 270bhp+ iirc, which put me off a bit.
The N20 (the same age) are identical internally. There was a rumour that the 28i has 'strengthened' pistons, but I have never seen any evidence to back this up.
Funny you should mention the remapping issues; I have been looking at remapping our latest 20i but there is a 'warning' on one major chip installers website, but only for the 20i, not the 18i (didn't check the 28 tbh as it's not really worth doing). I keep intending to ask them why but haven't got round to it yet.
The same warning appears for the later B48 engine too, but haven't seen any evidence on BMW forums of failures. Coolant leaks on the B48, yes! :)
Last edited by Pondrew on Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All good things come to those who wait. I'm really impatient which explains a lot.

F31 320i. Good car.
E89 20i Now fully dried
Z3 'free litre'. Project and a half. Complicated!
Mazda3 sold
Tatty old R56 Mini Cooper. Money pit!

Silverstar
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 2738
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:06 am
Location: Costa Del Sol

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by Silverstar » Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:57 pm

As someone said the new ZF8 autos are fractionally more economical than the manual. You could go the 18i 20i route and remap but the 28i will always be more sought after and hold its value better IMHO, just because it was the top of the range of the 4 pots and less of them made and not everyone wants to remap or will want to buy a reamapped car further down the line.
2009 sdrive30i auto Sapphire Black / Coral Red

mudmonkey
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2024 3:34 pm

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by mudmonkey » Sun Mar 24, 2024 8:12 pm

Pondrew wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:54 pm The N20 (the same age) are identical internally. There was a rumour that the 28i has 'strengthened' pistons, but I have never seen any evidence to back this up.
Funny you should mention the remapping issues; I have been looking at remapping our latest 20i but there is a 'warning' on one major chip installers website, but only for the 20i, not the 18i (didn't check the 28 tbh as it's not really worth doing). I keep intending to ask them why but haven't got round to it yet.
The same warning appears for the later B48 engine too, but haven't seen any evidence on BMW forums of failures. Coolant leaks on the B48, yes! :)
Interesting. Yeah I'm always a bit wary of remaps personally. Hear too many horror stories, it's all fine....until it's not.

mudmonkey
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2024 3:34 pm

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by mudmonkey » Sun Mar 24, 2024 8:13 pm

Silverstar wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:57 pm As someone said the new ZF8 autos are fractionally more economical than the manual. You could go the 18i 20i route and remap but the 28i will always be more sought after and hold its value better IMHO, just because it was the top of the range of the 4 pots and less of them made and not everyone wants to remap or will want to buy a reamapped car further down the line.
You make a very good point. Trying to resell a remapped car does limit the audience somewhat.

Online
Pondrew
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 8523
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:20 pm
Location: Spaldingski

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by Pondrew » Sun Mar 24, 2024 8:17 pm

mudmonkey wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 8:13 pm Trying to resell a remapped car does limit the audience somewhat.
That is true. People generally think a remapped car has been thrashed and is only for 'boy racers' IME.
It's a shame, as the N20 is a much better engine with a remap in every department; especially the vast improvement in low down torque.
All good things come to those who wait. I'm really impatient which explains a lot.

F31 320i. Good car.
E89 20i Now fully dried
Z3 'free litre'. Project and a half. Complicated!
Mazda3 sold
Tatty old R56 Mini Cooper. Money pit!

User avatar
DonDon
Member
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2023 9:42 am
Location: North Hampshire - the original and best

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by DonDon » Fri Mar 29, 2024 10:56 am

I have seen claims that an original 28i has bigger brakes than the 18i or 20i. Don't know if it is true.
Last edited by DonDon on Tue Apr 02, 2024 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2013 E89 28i auto

User avatar
B21
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 5466
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2021 7:15 pm
Location: In my Banana Yellow Space Shuttle...somewhere over Southern Caledonia

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by B21 » Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:02 am

DonDon wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2024 10:56 am I have seen claims that an original 28i has bigger brakes then the 18i or 20i. Don't know if it is true.
28i had 330mm front brake as per 30i..the 18i and 20i had 300mm as per 23i.. :thumbsup:
We choose to go to on with this endeavour at this time and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard…
A very modified Atacama Yellow 35is :thumbsup:

Fady
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2024 11:15 pm
Location: Sussex/Surrey Border

E89 28i mpg Manual vs Auto

Post by Fady » Mon Apr 01, 2024 6:25 pm

Silverstar wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:57 pm As someone said the new ZF8 autos are fractionally more economical than the manual. You could go the 18i 20i route and remap but the 28i will always be more sought after and hold its value better IMHO, just because it was the top of the range of the 4 pots and less of them made and not everyone wants to remap or will want to buy a reamapped car further down the line.
I concur with the your statement on remapping. I have the 28i manual and would never have been knowingly interested in say a 20i remapped car. Rightly or wrongly remapping to me has negative connotations around previous ownership and is also something to factor in with insurance.

No idea on fuel economy as have not owned the car long so not many miles done (keep meaning to do my intro post but not got around to it!). Also mpg not a consideration as is effectively a weekend car. Wanted something with poke but considered the 3.0 versions unnecessary for my own use case as already have a larger engined car.
E89 28i M Sport Manual
Other Cars: Mercedes Benz E63, X4 M40i

Post Reply