Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.
How safe is our Z4?
- buzyg
- Legend
- Posts: 26566
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 6:11 pm
- Location: Cornwall
-
Online
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:30 am
How safe is our Z4?
The 2004 Z4 did get four stars
Comments The Z4 is a very strong scoring four-star car. It suffered very little damage to its cabin, the driver’s door remaining straight and substantially undamaged after the impact. The car was tested in the frontal crash with its roof down to give ‘worst-case’ results. Similarly, for the side impact, the top was left up to check for any adverse interaction with the driver’s head. Because the car has only two seats, it was tested without child restraints. However, it is possible to fit a restraint to the passenger’s seat so, the fitting and labelling requirements were checked. Protection for pedestrians proved to be fair.
Front impact The restraint system is based on a dual stage non-tethered airbag for the driver and for the passenger. Each has a belt pre-tensioner that, combined with load limiters worked well at keeping forces on occupants’ chests low. Late in the impact, the driver’s head moved towards the outside of the airbag, making a glancing contact with the screen pillar. The car’s body proved itself to be very strong, showing minimal deformation of the body structure around the sill and screen pillar and suffering only minor intrusion into the footwell. However, the knee impact areas for the driver were unforgiving, with hard structures abounding. Side impact The protection system is very impressive and includes a thorax airbag that worked well. The driver’s head contacted the roof rail, but not hard enough to cause concern. Child occupant As two adult dummies were fitted no room remained for a child restraint. It is possible to fit one to the passenger’s seat. However, the only warning of the dangers associated with doing so was a text label on the windscreen, which was non-permanent and poorly worded. Pedestrian Levels of protection were fair. The bonnet’s leading edge did not require testing as its shape and low height meant that it would not be aggressive. Some areas of its top gave protection. But its sides, wings and the bumper, proved particularly unfriendly
Comments The Z4 is a very strong scoring four-star car. It suffered very little damage to its cabin, the driver’s door remaining straight and substantially undamaged after the impact. The car was tested in the frontal crash with its roof down to give ‘worst-case’ results. Similarly, for the side impact, the top was left up to check for any adverse interaction with the driver’s head. Because the car has only two seats, it was tested without child restraints. However, it is possible to fit a restraint to the passenger’s seat so, the fitting and labelling requirements were checked. Protection for pedestrians proved to be fair.
Front impact The restraint system is based on a dual stage non-tethered airbag for the driver and for the passenger. Each has a belt pre-tensioner that, combined with load limiters worked well at keeping forces on occupants’ chests low. Late in the impact, the driver’s head moved towards the outside of the airbag, making a glancing contact with the screen pillar. The car’s body proved itself to be very strong, showing minimal deformation of the body structure around the sill and screen pillar and suffering only minor intrusion into the footwell. However, the knee impact areas for the driver were unforgiving, with hard structures abounding. Side impact The protection system is very impressive and includes a thorax airbag that worked well. The driver’s head contacted the roof rail, but not hard enough to cause concern. Child occupant As two adult dummies were fitted no room remained for a child restraint. It is possible to fit one to the passenger’s seat. However, the only warning of the dangers associated with doing so was a text label on the windscreen, which was non-permanent and poorly worded. Pedestrian Levels of protection were fair. The bonnet’s leading edge did not require testing as its shape and low height meant that it would not be aggressive. Some areas of its top gave protection. But its sides, wings and the bumper, proved particularly unfriendly
-
- Lifer
- Posts: 9541
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 9:09 am
- Location: South west Buckinghamshire
How safe is our Z4?
After attending many RTA's over the years, I would say the Z4 is pretty capable in a crash, the doors appear to hold up well and the windscreen didn't appear to crack.
BMW Z4 30i 2003 auto 107's Whippy Toledo Blue
Beige M sport seats, wood dash
Toyota MR2 NA 1995
Triumph GT6 1972 (project)
Land Rover Discovery 1994 TDI (Tow car)
Mini 1000 1981
Beige M sport seats, wood dash
Toyota MR2 NA 1995
Triumph GT6 1972 (project)
Land Rover Discovery 1994 TDI (Tow car)
Mini 1000 1981
-
- Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 2:46 pm
- Location: Pontypridd, S Wales
How safe is our Z4?
Oooooooh I feel faint watching that, that poor car!
Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Colin Chapman
- WLH
- Lifer
- Posts: 12277
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:08 am
- Location: Taxsylvania
- Contact:
How safe is our Z4?
I have always believed that on balance the E-85 Z4 is pretty safe as it did seem to do well in the crash test. When you also take into consideration the ability of the Z4's performance, handling and breaking to avoid an accident it seems to me to be a pretty safe place to be. Also to the best of my knowledge not one member of ZSCCA which currently has over 1,000 USA members has never lost a member due to a fatal accident in a Z4. I know of only one real serious injury and that individual is as far as I know still in a wheelchair.
- GuidoK
- Lifer
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:37 am
- Location: all over the place
How safe is our Z4?
Yes, e85 is 4 stars, e89 is 3 stars.
Not that the e89 is less safe; its a relative measurement, they set the bar higher and higher each year. It's a comparison to other cars in the same class in a certain era (roadster sport in this case)
So a 2017 roadster sport with 5 stars is a very safe 2017 roadster but still not as safe as a 2017 SUV with the same 5 stars.
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | fully polybushed | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers | Sachs Race Engineering clutch
- Mr Tidy
- Legend
- Posts: 23924
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:18 pm
- Location: North West Surrey
How safe is our Z4?
Yes, but that is the whole problem with this stuff!GuidoK wrote: ↑Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:42 pmYes, e85 is 4 stars, e89 is 3 stars.
Not that the e89 is less safe; its a relative measurement, they set the bar higher and higher each year. It's a comparison to other cars in the same class in a certain era (roadster sport in this case)
So a 2017 roadster sport with 5 stars is a very safe 2017 roadster but still not as safe as a 2017 SUV with the same 5 stars.
People may think an E85 is a better option than an E89 based on that, unless they know the bar got raised between their tests.
Keep the bar in the same place, or detail the criteria in place at the time of the test compared with current criteria - or it all becomes meaningless!
Coupes because stunning!
Current - Silver Grey MC, Imola Red heated Nappa & carbon trim. Aeros, H & R Coil-overs, 224s, OE Strut brace, Nav, cup-holders, DSP Hi-Fi, pdc, cruise, MFSW, no CDV! E90 330i daily
Gone - Montego Blue
Gone - Ruby Black
Current - Silver Grey MC, Imola Red heated Nappa & carbon trim. Aeros, H & R Coil-overs, 224s, OE Strut brace, Nav, cup-holders, DSP Hi-Fi, pdc, cruise, MFSW, no CDV! E90 330i daily
Gone - Montego Blue
Gone - Ruby Black
- sp3ctre
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7493
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:29 pm
- Contact:
How safe is our Z4?
Anyone remember the guy who drove his Z4 (M I think) off a cliff, landed upside down and walked away unscathed? Was in the early days of the forum, 2007-2008 I think.
If you are looking for low cost UK insurance, visit our official Z4-forum insurance scheme
- sp3ctre
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7493
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:29 pm
- Contact:
How safe is our Z4?
If you are looking for low cost UK insurance, visit our official Z4-forum insurance scheme
- GuidoK
- Lifer
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:37 am
- Location: all over the place
How safe is our Z4?
I think thats common knowledge. I mean I think everyone knows that a 90's car is generally less safe than a 2017 car but still in the 90's cars also got 5 stars.
It has been on most carshows.
I think its less common knowledge that different classes of cars are differently rated (so a 5 star hatchback is still less safe than a 5 star SUV)
In the end its a general safety quality rating. A relative comparison to similar cars of similar age and similar type.
lol you see a rwd sportscar demolished beyond recognition with a 20 year old next to it and its of course the cars fault
One sided accidents resulting in cars looking like that are 99,9999% of the time drivers fault.
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | fully polybushed | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers | Sachs Race Engineering clutch