Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

RS vs Z4MR

"M" Specific discussion
User avatar
Franzino
Member
Member
Posts: 851
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:53 pm

RS vs Z4MR

Post by Franzino » Tue Dec 27, 2016 3:39 am

wspohn wrote:
Franzino wrote:
wspohn wrote:
I'd have to respectfully disagree with that. I have a Z4MC and a friend has a Z4MR (that I found for him) and having the chance to compare both, same day, same road, results in a definite difference in handling feel in favour of the coupe.
I did the same back to back test and there is indeed a difference between the Z4M roadster and the Z4M coupe... Not a big difference, but a noticeable one.
Z3M roadster is a crap car in comparison with the Z3M coupe and I'm verry happy I never bought it.
I assume the last sentence is meant flippantly... :wink: The coupe styling agrees with my taste, but we aren't talking about aesthetics, just handling.
No I really mean this...when comparing the Z3M R with the Z3M C the difference is night and day... In comparison the Z3M R drives realy bad with a lot of body flex....to much in my opinion. The difference between de Z4M R and Z4M C is not that big and both drive great. But a coupe will mostly hold it's value higher then a convertible.... It seems the case with a lot of cars. Because a Z4M C was only available in 3.0 and M, the coupe shape is also way more exclusive to see on the roads then the Z4M R which was available for longer times and with more tax friendly engines.

Online
User avatar
buzyg
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26421
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 6:11 pm
Location: Cornwall

RS vs Z4MR

Post by buzyg » Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:58 pm

Just caught the Vamps on the music channel. Gorgeous Ford Escort Mexico. That's one reason they are so popular for sure. 8) :thumbsup:
Image

Post Reply