Nictrix wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:58 pm
I was told something recently about the twin towers, not sure if it is true or not but is plausible.
In the design of the buildings because they were so tall and that there were lots of other buildings in close proximity there had to be a way to demolish the building in the future safely. The way they came up with this work around was when the building was being built there were charges put in place that could be used later if needed which would save time/money when the building needed to be brought down.
These charges already being in place was how they could bring the building down so quickly, safely and it ending up in its own footprint like a controlled demolition would.
As with all good conspiracy theories though this does sound like it could have happened but would need experts to confirm that it actually happened.
Why did the other building collapse? (building 7 I think) nothing hit it, and again into its own footprint like a controlled demolition.
I'm glad someone mentioned the third tower, this seems to be largely ignored, or rather it is simply less known about because it can't be explained so instead the approach is to pretend it never happened. That approach on the whole has worked.
Not that I'm a conspiracy hack