Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

28i Opinion?

Specific discussion about the E89 2009 Z4 (sDrive35is, sDrive35i, sDrive30i, sDrive23i)
User avatar
Marlon
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 10899
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:13 am
Location: Lancs.
Contact:

28i Opinion?

Post by Marlon » Thu Sep 15, 2016 7:12 pm

Back when BMW were designing the new E89 model range was their brief to make it as difficult as possible for the punters to understand and remember all the engines and gear options - turbo and non turbo - 4 pot and 6 pot - DTC / manual / auto . . . and then there's all the trim levels. Perhaps its just me, but I find the combinations and permutations of the E89 components mind bogglingly complex :cry:
Image
Gone: 3.0si 2008 E85
911 997 Carrera S

User avatar
Nictrix
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 5453
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:59 pm
Location: Paisley

28i Opinion?

Post by Nictrix » Thu Sep 15, 2016 7:28 pm

Marlon wrote:Back when BMW were designing the new E89 model range was their brief to make it as difficult as possible for the punters to understand and remember all the engines and gear options - turbo and non turbo - 4 pot and 6 pot - DTC / manual / auto . . . and then there's all the trim levels. Perhaps its just me, but I find the combinations and permutations of the E89 components mind bogglingly complex :cry:
I dont think this is just limited to the E89 range, with most BMWs these days you need some sort of in depth knowledge to figure out what the numbers on the back or sides actually mean.
For instance the X6. There are 4 (I think) different 3 litre diesel engines with designations 30d, 35d, 40d and 50d. All engines are slightly different, from single turbo to triple turbo. And thats not counting the petrol engines either.
E89 2014 35i M Sport Black with Black leather :)

Maniac
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 8202
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:52 pm

28i Opinion?

Post by Maniac » Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:10 am

john-e89 wrote:
Nictrix wrote:
john-e89 wrote:
What made you buy the 35i over the 28i then Maniac? Just the power difference? Or does the lack of a 6 play a part if it's not down to pure grunt?
My guess would be that the 28i model was not available until 3 years after Maniac purchased his 35i.
Ah ok cheers Nictrix, be interesting to hear which he'd pick out of the two had both been available at the same time.
I'd still go with the best I could afford. The 35i was the best e89 you could buy when I bought mine. Not even M Sport models were available back then.

The car may be heavier but the N54 engine really is worth the money.. the torque and sound make the car for me.

User avatar
ric19
Member
Member
Posts: 818
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:37 am

28i Opinion?

Post by ric19 » Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:52 am

John, drove from Dronfield up to Beadnell on Monday and was getting 44 mpg in my 28i I did 350 miles and still had more than a quarter of a tank left

Maniac
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 8202
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:52 pm

28i Opinion?

Post by Maniac » Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:18 pm

Marlon wrote:Back when BMW were designing the new E89 model range was their brief to make it as difficult as possible for the punters to understand and remember all the engines and gear options - turbo and non turbo - 4 pot and 6 pot - DTC / manual / auto . . . and then there's all the trim levels. Perhaps its just me, but I find the combinations and permutations of the E89 components mind bogglingly complex :cry:
Actually the confusion takes time. When the car first came out you had the 23i, 30i, 35i in SE trim only... that was all you had to worry about before a hundred options.

User avatar
Nictrix
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 5453
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:59 pm
Location: Paisley

28i Opinion?

Post by Nictrix » Fri Sep 16, 2016 4:49 pm

Maniac wrote:
Marlon wrote:Back when BMW were designing the new E89 model range was their brief to make it as difficult as possible for the punters to understand and remember all the engines and gear options - turbo and non turbo - 4 pot and 6 pot - DTC / manual / auto . . . and then there's all the trim levels. Perhaps its just me, but I find the combinations and permutations of the E89 components mind bogglingly complex :cry:
Actually the confusion takes time. When the car first came out you had the 23i, 30i, 35i in SE trim only... that was all you had to worry about before a hundred options.
But even then to an average guy in the street they will be a 2.3L engine, a 3.0L engine and a 3.5L engine instead of 1 x 2.5L and 2 x 3.0L.
E89 2014 35i M Sport Black with Black leather :)

User avatar
pvr
Legend
Legend
Posts: 26269
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: South East UK

28i Opinion?

Post by pvr » Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:27 pm

As well as at the dealer where my X5 is classed as a 4 litre on the paperwork.
Current:
911-50 Black - unique spec
X5M - 575 hp of fun in a V8
Abarth 595 Comp.
Golf Clipper - collectors item
Z4 3.0si Black Sapphire
VW ID.3

Previous:
Z4M Silver Grey - non flimper spec (gone to Bing)
Z4 3.0 Toledo

User avatar
Nictrix
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 5453
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:59 pm
Location: Paisley

28i Opinion?

Post by Nictrix » Fri Sep 16, 2016 8:01 pm

pvr wrote:As well as at the dealer where my X5 is classed as a 4 litre on the paperwork.
I get asked the same thing :)
E89 2014 35i M Sport Black with Black leather :)

Post Reply