That's the sticky point is it not?Acid_Monkey wrote:Thing is his insurers have the video evidence and photos to prove his guilt.
Surely the third parties insurers should be able to decide liability without actually speaking to the driver / their client?
It's the driver/named drivers that are insured and not the vehicle so unless they (the ins comp) can prove who was driving at the time, they'll not be too eager to pay out/accept responsibility.