Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.
Show the 2.0i some love
- blackabbot
- Member
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:29 am
- Location: North Wales
Show the 2.0i some love
After all the bad press the 2.0 engine has had on this forum and the heated debates regarding the reliability of the 3's versus the 2's engines I was wondering if past or present E85 2.0 owners would give there thoughts and views on 2.0 ownership.This thread is in no way meant to inflame the debate further, rather to give a more balanced view for potential Z4 owners.
I bought my 2.0i Sport in Febuary this year and have done 2478 miles in the last four months , it has not thrown up any issues whatsoever ,Everything in the car works as it should. I knew what the power output of the engine was when I bought it and knew it would not win any prizes on track days, that being said I don't drive "like miss daisy" and find the four pot more than meets my needs for this great looking roadster. the handling in corners and the steering is superb as is the 6 speed gearbox, driving mainly around north wales the 2.0i certainly does not feel under powered or as one member who's recent reply to a post said "you're revving the tits off the 4 pot to get any power out" I havn't found that to be true.
Some members regard the four pot to be the least desirable and unreliable of all the power units in the E85 and their entitled to their opinion, and I respect that as they are more knowledgeable regarding the Z4 then I am.
but here is the mot history of my Z first used 30th January 2008
19th January 2011 mileage 20,687 pass
13th January 2012 " 25,369 pass
9th January 2013 " 29,162 pass
29th January 2014 " 34, 050 Fail...............Reason for failure
1. n/side front tyre has ply or cords exposed
2. o/side front tyre has ply or cords exposed
1. advisory front brake pad/s wearing thin
29th January 2014 " 34,050 pass
22nd January 2015 " 39,036 pass
15th January 2016 " 44,920 pass 1. advisory offside rear tyre worn close to legal limit
6th Febuary 2017 " 48,705 pass
I bought the car on the 4th feb 2017 and checked the mot history online before I bought it, not bad for a nine year old Z.
I don't post all the time but I'm on the forum every day and although not mechanically minded I love to see what members are doing to their cars and respect and admire the love and attention to detail they give to their cars, I know the majority of E85 owners on this forum have the six cylinder engine, but I'm just trying to stand up for the little guy, the one driving a four pot around north wales daily with a big grin on his face and a semi-lob on every time I look in my side mirrors and see those lovely flared wheel arches and don't get me started on the rear end, as you can tell I love my car and who knows I may buy a 3 litre in the future, but at the moment I'm happy with the four pot, Surely I can't be the only person who's bought a 2.0i that was cared for and maintained by a previous owner and has no problems or issues, so come on guys if you own or have owned a four pot give us your views.
And to all the six cylinder guys as the thread title say
SHOW ME SOME LOVE
I bought my 2.0i Sport in Febuary this year and have done 2478 miles in the last four months , it has not thrown up any issues whatsoever ,Everything in the car works as it should. I knew what the power output of the engine was when I bought it and knew it would not win any prizes on track days, that being said I don't drive "like miss daisy" and find the four pot more than meets my needs for this great looking roadster. the handling in corners and the steering is superb as is the 6 speed gearbox, driving mainly around north wales the 2.0i certainly does not feel under powered or as one member who's recent reply to a post said "you're revving the tits off the 4 pot to get any power out" I havn't found that to be true.
Some members regard the four pot to be the least desirable and unreliable of all the power units in the E85 and their entitled to their opinion, and I respect that as they are more knowledgeable regarding the Z4 then I am.
but here is the mot history of my Z first used 30th January 2008
19th January 2011 mileage 20,687 pass
13th January 2012 " 25,369 pass
9th January 2013 " 29,162 pass
29th January 2014 " 34, 050 Fail...............Reason for failure
1. n/side front tyre has ply or cords exposed
2. o/side front tyre has ply or cords exposed
1. advisory front brake pad/s wearing thin
29th January 2014 " 34,050 pass
22nd January 2015 " 39,036 pass
15th January 2016 " 44,920 pass 1. advisory offside rear tyre worn close to legal limit
6th Febuary 2017 " 48,705 pass
I bought the car on the 4th feb 2017 and checked the mot history online before I bought it, not bad for a nine year old Z.
I don't post all the time but I'm on the forum every day and although not mechanically minded I love to see what members are doing to their cars and respect and admire the love and attention to detail they give to their cars, I know the majority of E85 owners on this forum have the six cylinder engine, but I'm just trying to stand up for the little guy, the one driving a four pot around north wales daily with a big grin on his face and a semi-lob on every time I look in my side mirrors and see those lovely flared wheel arches and don't get me started on the rear end, as you can tell I love my car and who knows I may buy a 3 litre in the future, but at the moment I'm happy with the four pot, Surely I can't be the only person who's bought a 2.0i that was cared for and maintained by a previous owner and has no problems or issues, so come on guys if you own or have owned a four pot give us your views.
And to all the six cylinder guys as the thread title say
SHOW ME SOME LOVE
2008, E85 2.0i sport, Titan Silver, Hardtop, ZHP Gear Knob, Chrome Exhaust Tip , Hydro Graphic Carbon Interior, DLV roof motor relocation and CDV delete and a Whippy
-
- Member
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 6:51 pm
Show the 2.0i some love
Its lacking in torque, BHP, engine note and reliability
When the purchase price differences are none existent I don't see why you'd opt for a bland, under powered 2 litre when you could go for a creamy straight six!
But if you're happy that's what matters. As I've had performance cars for the last 10 years near enough, I couldn't ever downgrade to a none performance car like the 2 litre E85. But if you're happy who cares what anyone else has to say!
When the purchase price differences are none existent I don't see why you'd opt for a bland, under powered 2 litre when you could go for a creamy straight six!
But if you're happy that's what matters. As I've had performance cars for the last 10 years near enough, I couldn't ever downgrade to a none performance car like the 2 litre E85. But if you're happy who cares what anyone else has to say!
Z4 now sold
Current - M235i
Current - M235i
-
- Member
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:59 am
Show the 2.0i some love
Well said that man !
I've had my 2 litre for 5 months now and so far no problems !
Well apart from yesterday when getting it out of the garage found the front coil Spring had broken !
But that's a problem we all have to put up with no matter what engine size.
Cheers Keith.
I've had my 2 litre for 5 months now and so far no problems !
Well apart from yesterday when getting it out of the garage found the front coil Spring had broken !
But that's a problem we all have to put up with no matter what engine size.
Cheers Keith.
-
- Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:33 pm
Show the 2.0i some love
Happy with mine.
Car used as a daily drive, I have had the car 15 months and covered 18,000 miles, no engine problems at all during that time and car is now 11 years old with 57,000 miles on the clock.
Previous history shows rocker cover gasket replaced, and front suspension bushes. I have replaced front spring, brake pressure sensors, and exhaust bracket and that's it other than tyres etc.
The engine oil has not required topping up throuought the 18,000 miles other than at service which was done after I bought the car and at 12,000.
Car used as a daily drive, I have had the car 15 months and covered 18,000 miles, no engine problems at all during that time and car is now 11 years old with 57,000 miles on the clock.
Previous history shows rocker cover gasket replaced, and front suspension bushes. I have replaced front spring, brake pressure sensors, and exhaust bracket and that's it other than tyres etc.
The engine oil has not required topping up throuought the 18,000 miles other than at service which was done after I bought the car and at 12,000.
- philbo909
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 4:46 pm
- Location: SN8
Show the 2.0i some love
I said you have to rev the tits off it to get any power out and it's true, but unlike it's 6 pot sisters, the 2l is a good mx5 alternative, revvy engines in light-ish cars that love to corner. In the year i had the 2 litre it gave me no other issues except getting left in the dust on straights
Sapphire black z4 coupe 135,000miles young
- Fox889
- Member
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:12 pm
- Location: God's very own county.....Suffolk
Show the 2.0i some love
with a big grin on his face and a semi-lob
Buy a six pot & you'll have a 'full lob'!
2004 3.0 Z4 in Sterling grey metallic
- Fox889
- Member
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:12 pm
- Location: God's very own county.....Suffolk
Show the 2.0i some love
Each to his own Blackabbot, doesn't matter if it's a four pot six pot or whatever, it's your car so give it all the love you can!
2004 3.0 Z4 in Sterling grey metallic
- Marlon
- Lifer
- Posts: 10899
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:13 am
- Location: Lancs.
- Contact:
Show the 2.0i some love
Where's Paulgs1000 when you need him - he drives an ///M now but started in a 2 litre and . . . (well I will leave him to say)
Gone: 3.0si 2008 E85
911 997 Carrera S
- step_change
- Member
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:21 pm
- Location: Planet Earth
- Contact:
Show the 2.0i some love
Take into account that this is an enthusiast's forum and consequently, you'll get a skewed opinion sample of people waxing-lyrical about the 2.5 and 3 litre (and M versions) and less complementary at the 2.0L.
Sure get the 3.0L if one comes up in the condition you like and at your budget. But the 2.0L is a nice car as well.
Sure get the 3.0L if one comes up in the condition you like and at your budget. But the 2.0L is a nice car as well.
Gone : 2013 35is, Melbourne Red, DCT, Nav, Comfort pack
Gone: 2007 2.5is, Montego Blue, Auto, Nav
Gone: 2007 2.5is, Montego Blue, Auto, Nav
- ESP
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 12:36 pm
- Location: Braintree
- Contact:
Show the 2.0i some love
first reply and its a 3.0lt owner telling us about this reliability issue?
How unreliable?
Not as reliable as the 3.0lt (but yet still above average for reliability) or is there some apparent flaw that 4pots cant drive more than50miles with out needing a engine rebuild?
I think a bit of realistic reality, and less 'supposed' and 'Word of Mouth' as a reply.
I was AWARE the engine in my car, the stats and the figures. While looking for my car before buying i drove many 2.2, 2.5 and 3.0lt models. My final choice wasn't based on engine, but as a whole.
I have had my Z4 over 6 years now and literally not one issue
07 Sapphire Black Roadster.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1873
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:11 pm
- Location: Rotherham
Show the 2.0i some love
Agreed, some people just jump on the band wagon and sometimes with no experience of what they're talking about.ESP wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2017 9:43 amfirst reply and its a 3.0lt owner telling us about this reliability issue?
How unreliable?
Not as reliable as the 3.0lt (but yet still above average for reliability) or is there some apparent flaw that 4pots cant drive more than50miles with out needing a engine rebuild?
I think a bit of realistic reality, and less 'supposed' and 'Word of Mouth' as a reply.
I was AWARE the engine in my car, the stats and the figures. While looking for my car before buying i drove many 2.2, 2.5 and 3.0lt models. My final choice wasn't based on engine, but as a whole.
I have had my Z4 over 6 years now and literally not one issue
I have had my 2.0i for over 5 years and no issues to report. I have it on Kw coilvers and 19" Csl and I think its a great DD. Whether im doing 3 miles to the train station of 150 miles to Hereford its a pleasure to drive.
The max speed limit in the UK is 70, and it has no problem getting to 70 in a straight line or 70 round a corner!!!
And before someone says it, I don't do track days, I wouldn't use a 3.0 z4!
- Machine monkey
- Lifer
- Posts: 11310
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:49 pm
- Location: In the shire Oxfordshire
Show the 2.0i some love
As a fully paid up 3.0l z4 owner who is not happy with the levels of power that delivers.
Saying that my wife’s best friend owns a 2.0l. Witch i seem to be maintain... And i get to drive it a fully enjoy the experience. You can use the power and drive it with more enthusiasm than you can 3.0l or 3.2 on the road safely.
Saying that my wife’s best friend owns a 2.0l. Witch i seem to be maintain... And i get to drive it a fully enjoy the experience. You can use the power and drive it with more enthusiasm than you can 3.0l or 3.2 on the road safely.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:28 pm
Show the 2.0i some love
7 years ago I went to the BMW dealer and saw a Z4 2.0 and fell in love with the lines of the roadster. I did not care about the size of the engine at that time and bought it the same day.
I use the Z4 as a daily driver and the past 7 years drove more than 90000 miles in summer and winter. All on summer tyres Pirelli P7. I think the 4 pot is a great engine with more than enough power for me. I still enjoy it every drive even in traffic jams.
I use the Z4 as a daily driver and the past 7 years drove more than 90000 miles in summer and winter. All on summer tyres Pirelli P7. I think the 4 pot is a great engine with more than enough power for me. I still enjoy it every drive even in traffic jams.
- MACK
- Lifer
- Posts: 3600
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:38 am
- Location: Manchester
Show the 2.0i some love
I think we are all well in trenched in our opinions on this but try to remember this came from a newbies thread asking for advice on what to buy within a certain budget etc today. A lot of 2.0 owners are taking what was said very personally which isn't how it was intended, well at least not be me and things snowballed from there.
In the early/mid 2000's (before diesel completely took over) I worked for a company that ran many hundreds of BMW 318i with the N42/46 2.0 engine in its company car fleet. We also had hundreds of 3 and 5 series with various M54/N52 engines. Cars covered anything from 15k to 150k in a 3-4 year period. Yes its fair to say we had engine issues with some of the M54/N52 engined cars, but it was quite rare. The N42/N46 was a major pain with literally hundreds of cars having engine issues of one sort or another.
Couple the above first hand experience to the experience of specialists/engine builders/indies and even private owners. The engine's relative lack of power/smoothness compared to its stablemates, the alarming fact that BMW felt the need to revise the timing chain tensioner on the N42/N46 again as late as mid 2016 and the fact that cars are all much of a muchness pricewise then unless MPG and insurance are absolutely critical the 2.0 doesn't really stack up to a buyer today.
If existing 2.0 owners looked at the argument dispassionately instead of taking to heart whats been said I don't see a logical argument here today. Of course its entirely possible that many 2.0 wont have a issue, but many will, many more as a percentage compared to the other engined zeds. It also entirely possible that a buyer today will be lucky and pick up a car thats had a fortune spent on it tacking the major issues, something most sellers wont tell you as they dont what a buyer thinking the car is problematic/unreliable.
In fact, just this weekend I advised a member on here who is having issues on a 2.0 that sounds very much like a timing chain issue.
Posting MOT history is completely pointless as its completely irrelevant. Posting I've not had an issue in 2,000 -70,000 miles or 2 months -7 years is a sample size of 1 and doesn't really show anything other than you may have been lucky so far. Other factors include many 2.0 owners who have had many problems over the years will have ditched the car by now and no longer on here.
Here's a scenario, if I gave you a budget to buy a secondhand laptop and just two were available within budget. Both are roughly the same age from the same manufacturer. However one has half the memory/processing power from a chip/harddrive etc that's known to be problematic. Option 2 is faster/quicker and more reliable/stable. Which one are you going to buy?
Exactly.
In the early/mid 2000's (before diesel completely took over) I worked for a company that ran many hundreds of BMW 318i with the N42/46 2.0 engine in its company car fleet. We also had hundreds of 3 and 5 series with various M54/N52 engines. Cars covered anything from 15k to 150k in a 3-4 year period. Yes its fair to say we had engine issues with some of the M54/N52 engined cars, but it was quite rare. The N42/N46 was a major pain with literally hundreds of cars having engine issues of one sort or another.
Couple the above first hand experience to the experience of specialists/engine builders/indies and even private owners. The engine's relative lack of power/smoothness compared to its stablemates, the alarming fact that BMW felt the need to revise the timing chain tensioner on the N42/N46 again as late as mid 2016 and the fact that cars are all much of a muchness pricewise then unless MPG and insurance are absolutely critical the 2.0 doesn't really stack up to a buyer today.
If existing 2.0 owners looked at the argument dispassionately instead of taking to heart whats been said I don't see a logical argument here today. Of course its entirely possible that many 2.0 wont have a issue, but many will, many more as a percentage compared to the other engined zeds. It also entirely possible that a buyer today will be lucky and pick up a car thats had a fortune spent on it tacking the major issues, something most sellers wont tell you as they dont what a buyer thinking the car is problematic/unreliable.
In fact, just this weekend I advised a member on here who is having issues on a 2.0 that sounds very much like a timing chain issue.
Posting MOT history is completely pointless as its completely irrelevant. Posting I've not had an issue in 2,000 -70,000 miles or 2 months -7 years is a sample size of 1 and doesn't really show anything other than you may have been lucky so far. Other factors include many 2.0 owners who have had many problems over the years will have ditched the car by now and no longer on here.
Here's a scenario, if I gave you a budget to buy a secondhand laptop and just two were available within budget. Both are roughly the same age from the same manufacturer. However one has half the memory/processing power from a chip/harddrive etc that's known to be problematic. Option 2 is faster/quicker and more reliable/stable. Which one are you going to buy?
Exactly.
Silver 05 3.0i SE
Mods inc - F/L Xenons Clear Ind Rear Lights M Sport Seats & Wheel Eibach/B4 3.64 DIFF (SOLD)
White E89 20i M Sport
Mods inc- B12 kit, M3 Arms, 18" Zito 935's with PS4's, Decat & Remap, Switchable Exhaust Flap (SOLD)
Mods inc - F/L Xenons Clear Ind Rear Lights M Sport Seats & Wheel Eibach/B4 3.64 DIFF (SOLD)
White E89 20i M Sport
Mods inc- B12 kit, M3 Arms, 18" Zito 935's with PS4's, Decat & Remap, Switchable Exhaust Flap (SOLD)
- ESP
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 12:36 pm
- Location: Braintree
- Contact:
Show the 2.0i some love
So Have you owned or had a 2.0 BMW yourself?MACK wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2017 12:32 pm In the early/mid 2000's (before diesel completely took over) I worked for a company that ran many hundreds of BMW 318i with the N42/46 2.0 engine in its company car fleet. We also had hundreds of 3 and 5 series with various M54/N52 engines. Cars covered anything from 15k to 150k in a 3-4 year period. Yes its fair to say we had engine issues with some of the M54/N52 engined cars, but it was quite rare. The N42/N46 was a major pain with literally hundreds of cars having engine issues of one sort or another.
I am in no doubt that there will be break downs and 1 engine will statistically perform better than another, thats reality. What suggesting is there is some sort of Major engine issue that would require a total recall, and that 2.0 is prone, bound to and will eventually with out any doubt fail. Compare this to Ford, Renault, Vauxhall etc... are you suggesting there 2.0 or equivalent engine's dont have reliability issues.
1 example (all though there are thousands of others) would be VW's 1.8 20v engine that will very often (not always) require a new coil pack before it reaches 50000 miles, this happened twice on a Golf GTi we leased, after 3 years this car had covered over 110 000miles. This was then replaced by a 2.0 118I M SPORT, which after 3 years covered over 100 000, and we kept on the lease for a further 18month, finally returning the car with almost 150 000miles on the clock, with no mechanical problems.
Thats not to say someone else with a similar car might have a issues with in the first 18-24 months of ownership.
No one here is saying the 2.0 is a bullet proof engine, but no one here running a 2.0 seems to have these major constant, engine failures you keep telling us the 2.0 is "Well documented" to have?
07 Sapphire Black Roadster.